[HC] T'he fate of HyperTalk?
(Msg 1 of 3)
xaviergarciaeroles <xgarcia@[redacted].com>
Saturday, 22-Sep-2012 22:28 GMT
What do you think about HyperTalk as the scrpting language of FileMaker Pro?
Xavier
Regards from Catalonia, next European State
[HC] T'he fate of HyperTalk?
(Msg 2 of 3)
Arthur Evans Jr <evanssl21@[redacted].net>
Sunday, 23-Sep-2012 01:43 GMT
Well, I surely believe that Hypertalk would be an improvement. OTOH,
that's not saying much since the scripting language in FileMaker is
such a disaster that ANYTHING would be an improvenent.
Art Evans
>What do you think about HyperTalk as the scrpting language of FileMaker Pro?
>
>Xavier
>Regards from Catalonia, next European State
[HC] T'he fate of HyperTalk?
(Msg 3 of 3)
paul.gronemeyer <paulgronemeyer@[redacted].de>
Saturday, 01-Dec-2012 11:12 GMT
I like FileMaker and made complex databases with it
but i can not imagine making a game like SimHarbor (HC and AddColor XCMD) using Filemaker. FileMaker is good for databases but HyperCard/HyerTalk gave you so much freedom. I have understand the mechanism of the merry X mas virus for hypercard and with the way FileMaker allow programming it is not possible to make a virus
--- In HyperCard-Mailing-List, Arthur Evans Jr <evanssl21@...> wrote:
>
> Well, I surely believe that Hypertalk would be an improvement. OTOH,
> that's not saying much since the scripting language in FileMaker is
> such a disaster that ANYTHING would be an improvenent.
>
> Art Evans
>
> >What do you think about HyperTalk as the scrpting language of FileMaker Pro?
> >
> >Xavier
> >Regards from Catalonia, next European State
>
HyperCard® and HyperTalk™ remain trademarks of Apple, Inc.; other trademarked products and terms mentioned in this archive are the property of their respective trademark holders. Individual messages remain the intellectual property of their respective authors.